Re: DOCTYPE decl

James Tauber (jtauber@jtauber.com)
Wed, 2 Sep 1998 17:20:08 +0800


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>

>Can I just check the following with folks on the list
>
>I have what I would like to be a well-formed, but not valid, document:
>
><!DOCTYPE mydocname [
><!ENTITY entityname "Some replacement text">
>]>
>
><mydocname>&entityname;</mydocname>
>
>Question:
>If I have to include a !DOCTYPE declaration in order to declare
>entities, am I also forced to declare the root element with an !ELEMENT
>decl. too?

No, not at all. What you have above is well-formed, but not valid, just as
you want.

James

--
James Tauber / jtauber@jtauber.com      http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network             ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School                  ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia                ( http://www.schema.net/