Re: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization

Paul Prescod (papresco@technologist.com)
Wed, 31 Dec 1997 12:16:17 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Peter Murray-Rust: "Re: Failure Criteria: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java"
Previous message: Sean Mc Grath: "Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)"
Maybe in reply to: Wendell Piez: "Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization"

At 01:51 PM 12/31/97 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>> >Thanks for catching the error. That copy is out-of-date. I'll send a note
>> >to Dr. Gui and ask for it to be fixed.
>
>Why call this an error? Why not just clearly label it as syntax which is
>not valid or WF XML, but can be allowed in SGML.

Obviously it is an error in the context of an article on XML. If it were an
article on SGML, or SGML/XML, it would be correct.

Paul Prescod

Next message: Peter Murray-Rust: "Re: Failure Criteria: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java"
Previous message: Sean Mc Grath: "Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)"
Maybe in reply to: Wendell Piez: "Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization"