Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
Sean Mc Grath (digitome@iol.ie)
Wed, 31 Dec 1997 16:02:35 GMT
[Paul Prescod]
>
>If a byte-for-byte entity transform (and not just a grove-identity
>transform) is a requirement, SAX-J would have to keep a whole pile of
>information about whitespace and perhaps other normalizations that I forget
>right now...
>
Yes. We need some way to express levels of "logical equivalence" between XML
docs.
An agreement on this would point the way to a list of what must and what
optionally may
be in SAX-⟨.
Sean Mc Grath
sean at digitome dot com