Re: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?

James Robertson (jamesr@steptwo.com.au)
Wed, 02 Dec 1998 19:06:53 +1000


At 18:48 2/12/1998 , you wrote:

| Joel Bender <joel@spooky.emcs.cornell.edu> writes:
|
| > I was thinking along similar lines. I've been adding something like this
| > to my XML documents:
|
| > <prop name="state" xml:regexp="[A-Z]+">NY</prop>
|
| It's a neat way of doing it, since checking is optional and
| transparent to non-checking applications.

Wouldn't this be better placed in a DTD?

By adding a fixed, pre-set attribute with the regexp to
element definitions in the DTD, you can enforce consistency.

Otherwise, can't the user just choose to use this or not,
on an individual, ad-hoc basis?

If so, what are we enforcing?

All that being said, I am of the belief that all of
this should be placed in application code. XML isn't
a solution to any problem, it is a storage and interchange
format for applications ...

Why try to cram the entire world of computing
science into XML?

Cheers,

James

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au

"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623