That is, can we declare an ENTITY that contains a PI? That would
allow encapsulation, but I don't think this is supported currently.
My reading of PI is that it is an alternative syntax around ENTITY
and directly to an application. I don't see how to include PI within an
ENTITY.
In any case, the ENTITY would need to have a pop default namespace stack
PI at the end or you would need a second PI at the end, which defeats
the purpose of working with the parser.
Is there a way to do that currently? I don't think so. Anyone else?
I think we need to look at enhancing PI syntax into the DTD if we
don't want a <EVENT> or other new DTD syntax.
Or am I just rambling here?
At 02:22 PM 12/1/98 +0100, you wrote:
>why doesn't one just use a processing instruction for this?
>
>Bryan Cooper wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> In the DTD, I'd like to see this type of syntax:
>>
>> < !EVENT push_new_context_for_namespace_example xnmls="different_ns"
>> TYPE="push"/>
>>
>
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
>
...bryan
F. Bryan Cooper 707 823 7324
VERITAS Software 707 321 3301 mobile
Bryan.Cooper@veritas.com