> To save bandwidth, I am including some rationale for the
> specific syntax we are using in this specification.
I believe that a lightly edited version of this rationale should
be included as an (informative) appendix to the recommendation.
Otherwise I believe people will see the rec as unmotivated
and will ignore it.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)