Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)

Tim Bray (tbray@textuality.com)
Fri, 11 Sep 1998 07:22:34 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Bray: "Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape"
Previous message: Chris von See: "Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Murray-Rust: "XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)"
Next in thread: David Megginson: "Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)"

At 08:40 AM 9/11/98, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
>Or am I right that XML is fundamentally about as boring as the introduction
>of TTL or 3-phase electricity - worthy, but manufacturer-level only?

That might very well be the case. -Tim

Next message: Tim Bray: "Re: [ANN] Kludgey workarounds for IE and Netscape"
Previous message: Chris von See: "Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Murray-Rust: "XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)"
Next in thread: David Megginson: "Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)"