Hmm and what about Element, Attribute and even Entity declarations within=
an =
external subset DTD? (i've got in mind the pizza model of the TEI DTD). T=
he =
XML REC says that "If the same entity is declared more than once, the fir=
st =
declaration encountered is binding;" (4.2 Entity Declarations). Why can't=
we =
make the same kind of binding for NS prefixes ?
"David Megginson" david@megginson.com said:
] Reasonable people may disagree: many of us believe (from SGML
] experience, especially) that entities are simply slightly-constrained
] storage units with no other special significance -- if Java had
] #include files, then those would be the equivalents of XML entities.
I fully agree with you:
"An XML document is an XML document !"
I quote Lou Burnard who used to say that "an SGML document is an SGML =
document" talking about entities and document fragments in SGML.
A Bient=F4t !
Pat.
-- =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
bonhomme@loria.fr | Office : B.228
http://www.loria.fr/~bonhomme | Phone : 03 83 59 30 52
--------------------------------------------------------------
* Serveur Silfide : http://www.loria.fr/projets/Silfide
* Projet Aquarelle : http://aqua.inria.fr
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D