> "[W]ill" in what sense? In the sense that IE 5, developed before the
> current namespace spec does this? In the sense that you think it
> might.
In the sense of clause 5.4 of CSS2: "A type selector matches the name
of a document language element type". The name, not the UniversalName.
> The behavior of CSS in the presence of namespaces is undefined. But I
> have every reason to expect that it will follow the (soon-to-be-)
> defined behavior of XSL, which is that the universal name is
> compared.
"Every reason" as in "reasons you can't talk about"?
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)