What you described is exactly what I was trying to explain. It sure is nice
to have others standy by to interpret my ramblings <g>.
>This represents quite a complex processing model. It requires a processor
>to run through the first few gigabytes of log and then change schemas and
>run through the next. I think you would be better with a different file for
>each schema change and link them together with XLink/entities.
I already have a working prototype that does this and it does not require
complex processing model. It just looks complex.
>Yup. Let's solve the single schema problem first. Simon?
But don't you prefer completely crazy hairball of a problem over simple
problems? <G> Thanks for the help. I think I'll continue to kick the
hairball on my own just for 'kicks'.
Regards,
Don