Ron Bourret writes:
>I agree, although for a different reason. I've just gotten to writing
>this part of the code and have to admit that having to parse
>something the parser can parse for me makes me very grumpy indeed.
>Note that the EnumerationValue element is used by both enumerated
>attributes and notation attributes.
I have no objections to this; it seems to return some of the flexibility and
documentability we lost by moving to the attributes model, without bringing
back too much verbosity.
Anyone disagree?
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies