Paul Grosso replied to my enquiries with this comment
>As a submission, it [XSL] is only a partial starting point,
>and detailed discussion of it is of very questionable
>utility (and I suspect most of the authors of the submission
>will not find it well worth their time to reply).
Some weeks later Arbortext announced an XSL product.
My point? Any suggestion that the XSL etc. lists are
run along the same "open" lines as XML-SIG is/was seems
rather dubious to me.
Sean Mc Grath
http://www.digitome.com
"there are two types of people in the world. Those who
think the world consists of two types of people, and
those who don't"