> DOCTYPEs will be problematic with WF documents from more than one namespace.
Only if one particular namespace proposal is accepted.
Personally, I (and many others) believe that architectural forms
provide a much simpler, cleaner, and more powerful solution to the
namespace problem -- a document using AFs can still be validated
against a DTD, for example -- but perhaps the WG has already made up
its collective mind to the contrary.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@microstar.com
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)