Re: NXP/MSXML confusion

Norbert H. Mikula (nmikula@edu.uni-klu.ac.at)
Thu, 28 Aug 1997 08:02:46 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Bray: "RE: Request for advice defining an XML based syntax"
Previous message: Chris Lovett: "RE: NXP/MSXML confusion"
Maybe in reply to: Matt Jones: "NXP/MSXML confusion"

Matt Jones wrote:
>
> Hello,
> We are trying to use NXP and MSXML to validate xml documents with a
> specific
> DTD, but we are getting inconsistent results from the two programs.
> The results from the two parsers, plus the simple dtd and xml files,
> are at the end of this message.

In one of the last releases I introduced a very stupid bug
in the validation module. I am already working on a new release
which will fix this bug (and others). I am very sorry about
the inconvenience that this might have caused.

Thanx to pointing this out. Please watch this and other
lists for the announcement of the upcoming new release.

-- 
Best regards,
Norbert H. Mikula

=====================================================
= SGML, XML, DSSSL, Intra- & Internet, AI, Java 
=====================================================
= mailto:nmikula@edu.uni-klu.ac.at 
= http://www.edu.uni-klu.ac.at/~nmikula
=====================================================





 Next message: Tim Bray: "RE: Request for advice defining an XML based syntax"
 Previous message: Chris Lovett: "RE: NXP/MSXML confusion"
 Maybe in reply to: Matt Jones: "NXP/MSXML confusion"