Re: various issues

David Megginson (dmeggins@uottawa.ca)
Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:10:51 -0400


Peter Murray-Rust writes:

> What follows is the meta-DTD, right? And the system knows it's
> a meta-DTD because of the inclusion of one or more <?ArcBase PIs?

No, it's a derived DTD (actually, a DTD for a document that implements
a derived architecture). A meta-DTD will not usually have an
<?ArcBase ..?> PI, unless it is mapped to yet another meta-DTD.

If you write a DTD, and include

<?ArcBase html?>

in that DTD, you are suggesting that your DTD uses HTML as a base
architecture. The HTML DTD is the meta-DTD, and it is not modified in
any way.

> What this is doing is mapping elements in different DTDs to the
> same element in your meta-DTD. This implies that they are synonyms
> in some way. Does it assume that they have the same content model,
> attributes and that the elements in the content model have
> (recursively) been mapped onto the DTD. Or are you essentially
> aliasing SYM in HTML to SYMBOL and SYMBOL in MATH to SYMBOL but
> having to provide different content models and processing for each?

No, it's the other way around -- the DTD for the derived architecture
maps some of its elements to those in one or more meta-DTDs (though
you don't have to do the mapping in the DTD itself). If you're
creating document type X, and you're including architectures from
CALS, HTML, and TEI-L, then you put the mappings in the X DTD.

They don't have to have exactly the same content models -- the content
model in the derived DTD can be more restrictive (but not less).

> This means your DTD is a superset of the other DTDs and your own elements?

Not exactly -- it means that there is an intersection between the
semantics of your DTD and the semantics of each of the meta-DTD. Your
DTD may have element types that are not in the meta-DTD, and the
meta-DTD may have element types that are not in your DTD.

> I think I start to understand. By 'structure' you mean the tree structure
> of each DTD? In which case AFs are a way of providing multiple views of the
> same document?

I don't follow.

All the best,

David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@microstar.com
University of Ottawa            dmeggins@uottawa.ca
        http://www.uottawa.ca/~dmeggins