Re: Suggested List Protocol
Len Bullard (cbullard@hiwaay.net)
Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:37:05 -0600
Gavin Nicol wrote:
>
> >Perhaps to start the ball rolling, I'll ask if anyone has used Lark or NXP
> >(Java-based). I've used both. What are you looking for in Parsers? Is the
> >API that Lark and NXP offer reasonable? Would you want to build in sgmls,
> >SP, sgmlc, etc.?
>
> I think that we should define a common parser API.
Second that. The lack of this and a *standard* way to define
the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and
grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a
development list.
len bullard
lockheed martin