> XML allows us to design languages that are palatable for human beings.
My proposed LocalMarkupFilter allows us to design languages that
are palatable for human beings (with syntax appropriate to a given
notation), but processable using only XML parser events, with no
second-order parser (technically, no second-order *lexer*) required.
> Just out of curiosity, here are some of the XML-related specs that fail
> according to your heuristic:
>
> * XPointer
> * XML Namespaces
> * XSL
Also URIs and URI references in general.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)