> So what you are saying here is that the use of a attribute is totally
> compatible with the use of NOTATIONs and when DTDs are used both are useful.
Just so.
> I suggest that xml:content (or xml:content-type) be used instead of xml:mime
> because MIME has lots of potential headers.
I agree.
[example snipped]
> Is this reasonable?
Yes.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)