> A simple DTD that causes a syntax error in XP.
> If you run the following dtd thru both jade
> and XP, it runs fine thru jade but XP gives a
> syntax error. The only difference is the order
> of the % inline and #PCDATA.
Jade is a general SGML tool, and doesn't enforce
XML restrictions on content models. XP does.
> So, given this, does imply that the order of #PCDATA
> is relevant or is this a genuine XP bug?
No, it's an XML rule: #PCDATA must be mentioned first,
because the minute a parser sees #PCDATA, it needs to enforce not
the general "element-content" rules but the different
"mixed-content" rules.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)