> The ISO HTML is in fact already created.
Ah, I didn't know it was an International Standard already.
> On the issue of whether W3C is a standards body, I think W3C has been pretty
> scrupulous to call their technologies "specifications" not "standards".
"Recommendations", no?
> But it is quite possible for a committee to stifle comments, even if they are
> good. To call it "politics" is just to say that technologies
> exist in the human world, where there are high stakes in the direction
> of technology.
Granted. But AFAIK the comments still have to be considered and
replied to, even if the reply amounts to "This idea is terminally
stupid". They can't be burked entirely. I am not accusing the
XML WG of doing anything of the sort, merely pointing out that
W3C committees *can* do that, and by the terms of their chartering
represent the consortium members, not the general public.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)