> The term "well-formed HTML" as used in section 1 of the XSL WD does not
> mean SGML that conforms to HTML 4.0. It means well-formed XML that uses
> element types and attributes from HTML.
Well and good. But "uses element types" etc. is vague: all element
types, or only some of them? It can't (straightforwardly) be all
of them, because SCRIPT and STYLE are CDATA elements, and so
have no XML equivalents.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)