> David,
>
> It might be a Good Thing (tm by Tyler) to setup a SAX Service Directory
Hehe... I suppose all you would really need here is to have a web server that
indexes the JAR files (or other binary container format for other languages) of
every parser.
> Server. This way, any SAX client can find the latest and the greatest SAX
> parser over the Net.
>
Another idea that has come to mind is moving the SAX directory structure from:
org.xml.sax
to:
org.xml.sax.parser
Things like standard output APIs may have some claim to being put in a standard
namespace like org.xml.sax For the sake of flexibility, perhaps moving SAX to a
sub-package may be best in the long run. SAX stands for Simple API for XML.
Right now this seems to only apply for parsers, but I think the next step may be
for formatters to be standardized as well.
Tyler