Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David Megginson: "Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)"
• Previous message: Dan Brickley: "Re: To validate or not to validate, that is the question"
• Next in thread: David Megginson: "Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)"
• Reply: David Megginson: "Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)"

> Namespaces are an inherently global construct and I can see no reason why
> document writers cannot live with a single prefix per global identifier
> within a document.

See http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-webarch-extlang#Local for some reasons.

James

• Next message: David Megginson: "Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)"
• Previous message: Dan Brickley: "Re: To validate or not to validate, that is the question"
• Next in thread: David Megginson: "Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)"
• Reply: David Megginson: "Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)"