Re: Java class != XML entity

Don Park (donpark@quake.net)
Wed, 12 Aug 1998 07:01:27 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Cowan: "Re: John Cowan's view on SAX extensions for ns drafts"
Previous message: W. Eliot Kimber: "Re: Java class != XML entity"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Jones: "Java class != XML entity"

>> The problem is that we don't have a good name for a collection of XML
>> documents working tightly together, the way that a collection of Java
>> classes can work in an applet or application -- "web" seems too loose,
>> and "docuverse" seems too New-Age. Any suggestions?

There is a spec named "XML-Package" which addressed the problem of packaging
multiple XML documents and related resources into a single XML document.
While the spec itself is on-hold at the moment, "package" or "pack" sounds
like a good name.

BTW, Docuverse is my company name so don't wear it out <g>.

Don Park
CTO/Docuverse

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: John Cowan's view on SAX extensions for ns drafts"
Previous message: W. Eliot Kimber: "Re: Java class != XML entity"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Jones: "Java class != XML entity"