-----Original Message-----
From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
[mailto:rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 1998 8:38 AM
To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Dates in XML
Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> ...
> I was looking at the XML-Data proposal just today and thinking 'why don't
> we use the primitives it defines, just as they are, without the rest of
> XML-data?'. This encourages me to offer the question to a wider audience.
I
> am seriously missing a specification for primitives - what do other
people
> think about borrowing those from XML-data?
Absolutely. For XSchema 1.1, I vote for a dt:dt attribute on the PCData
element.
The XML-Data spec shows the following ways to specify data types:
Attribute: <size dt:dt="int">8</size>
Subelement: <size><dt:int>8</dt:int></size>
Schema: <elementType id="size"><datatype dt="int"/></elementType>
I believe we should only adopt the first of these for now.
While there are no technical problems with the second, it seems counter to
the
spirit of XML: We are now most closely labeling the value 8 as an int,
rather
than as a size, which is what it really is.
The third is just plain confusing because the datatype subelement is not
part of
the content model. For example, what does the following XML-Data
declaration
mean? The sequence is an integer? I can imagine datatype elements as a
substitute for content models, but not in addition to them. Anything I'm
missing here?
<elementType id="size">
<datatype dt="int">
<group groupOrder="SEQ">
<element type="#shoe"/>
<element type="#shirt"/>
</group>
</elementType>
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)