RE: XSchema Spec, Section 3, Draft 2 (Namespaces)

Peter Murray-Rust (peter@ursus.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:23:19

At 20:45 02/07/98 UT, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Here's another go, trying to make everyone happy and cover my butt for the
>multiple interpretations I can derive from the current draft. I took James
>Anderson's suggestion that both the PI and the element could be included
as a
>reasonable way to cover all possibilities. While I don't think the PI is
>necessary, I can read that into the namespaces spec if I try hard enough.
(I
>can read many possibilities into the spec. This is fun!)
[... XSC namespace proposal snipped...]

I think you have done an excellent job given that none of us know where
XML-names is going to end up.

P.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg