This is wonderful Ron.
As for namespaces - I think it's worth *experimenting* and publishing our
results. Remember that (a) the final version is not there (b) namespaces
are not required to *do* anything other than uniquify names. I would advise
against attaching any semantics to any part of the current public namespace
draft. I think following the current public draft minimally and faithfully
will be valuable.
In JUMBO I have started to apply a minimalist approach the namespaces which:
- can generate a UniqueName by the concatenation of the prefix and the
local name
- checks for uniqueness as required by the draft
- can retrieve the Namespace determined by a prefix
and that's all.
Clearly you have to use the UniqueName in the interpretation of the Schema
just as a validating parser might have to expand the name and check it
against a namespace-aware DTD (if/when such a thing exists).
P.
>
>-- Ron Bourret
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
>
>
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg