Absolutely.
>
>>- The names themselves, which are currently taken from the XML spec
>>in hopes of some recognition, but could also be simplified
>>(ElementDecl -> Element, AttDef -> Attribute) as some members
>>of this list have suggested.
>
>I can go either way on this one. I thought sticking to the spec might
>encourage consistency, but I don't think the labels in the spec are in
>widespread usage. Element instead of ElementDecl is fine with me.
We could argue that when XSchema is finished the labels *will* be in wide
usage :-). The serious point is that if we have an element/attribute which
maps precisely onto a Name described in the spec, then we should use that
name and its (prose) semantics). But I'm not religious on any of this.
P.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg