This nightmare is precisely what we're trying to avoid. Comments are a weak
and downright bad means of providing anything more than the simplest
supporting information. XSchema is definitely an attempt to address this, and
I hope we meet your expectations. Please tell us if we don't.
>There seems to be a constant undercurrent of religion in xml-dev
>about validation vs. parsing vs. semantics, whose portent I
>don't apprehend.
I think for now I'm using the term 'verification', but this too may change. I
have to admit that this is a religious war I have no interest in participating
in. It shapes the terms of the XSchema development process to a certain
extent, but I'd like to think we can keep all schools of thought happy.
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies