> The goals only commit us to XSchema->DTD translation. While I don't mind
> including a section on DTD->XSchema translations, I don't want to get bound up
> trying to translate every bit of a DTD, even a normalized DTD, to an XSchema.
I missed this -- I thought we wanted to do both directions (at least from a
normalized DTD).
My reason for wanting this is so that a specialized parser can read an existing
DTD and give me XSchema SAX events, which I can then build into a tree and
explore. In fact, I regard this as initially more important than the other
direction since most people use DTDs, not XSchema.
-- Ron Bourret