> > An XML DTD in current DTD syntax doesn't need a new name at all,
> > of course -- XML DTD is fine.
>
> yes seriously. what's wrong with XML DTDs?
Nothing, as long as you're using it to refer to the current syntax of a DTD. If
it was used for the XML version, it would cause confusion differentiating between
an SGML DTD and an XML DTD, for instance.
> let's not coin a phrase for the sake of itself :-)
Why not? It's a proud tradition in the IT industry ... :-)
How about XROD (rendition of declarations)?
-- RegardsMarcus Carr email: mrc@allette.com.au _______________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) email: info@allette.com.au Level 10, 91 York Street www: http://www.allette.com.au Sydney 2000 NSW Australia phone: +61 2 9262 4777 fax: +61 2 9262 4774 _______________________________________________________________