Re: Automating Search Interfaces
Don Park (donpark@quake.net)
Fri, 20 Feb 1998 14:33:31 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_008E_01BD3E0C.844A6680
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pierre,
>I would like to talk about the location of the person making the search =
versus the location of the product or service provider. If I search for =
a product and I want it now, I only want a list of provider in a =
distance applicable for my request. And if I go to Europe this summer =
and want to make reservation or search for activities occuring at that =
time, the 'where I am' specification change. If I have a secondary house =
and make request on the week-end, I want the restaurant in that region =
and not the one near my primary house. An identity profile should be =
include in the query and give the chance to the search engine to make a =
better choice in regard of my age, sex, etc...
Interesting. Some of the issues with product location are:
1. How to indicate location?
Address or map coordinates? How does one find map coordinates? What =
happens when he moves?
2. How to associate location with products?
If a vendor has all inventory at a single location then the location can =
be #FIXED in his DTD. If inventory is distributed around the globe, =
each product or inventory group will have to be marked. The problem is =
that now it makes no sense to indicate physical location. It will have =
to be a store code which causes problem with search services since store =
codes will have to be converted into location format used by the search =
service.
As far as time constraints go, each product will probably be marked with =
time. The problem is that some time constraints are relative in nature.
*Ouch* I just thought of another painful problem with prices. What =
happens when a store wants to put on a sale? His database of products =
will have to map to different pricing schemes constrained by time, =
location, or association.
All this hurts my head a bit but it is very interesting indeed...
Regards,
Don Park
http://www.quake.net/~donpark/index.html
------=_NextPart_000_008E_01BD3E0C.844A6680
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
Pierre,
>I would like to talk about the location of the =
person=20
making the search versus the location of the product or service =
provider. If I=20
search for a product and I want it now, I only want a list of provider =
in a=20
distance applicable for my request. And if I go to Europe this summer =
and want=20
to make reservation or search for activities occuring at that time, the =
'where I=20
am' specification change. If I have a secondary house and make request =
on the=20
week-end, I want the restaurant in that region and not the one near my =
primary=20
house. An identity profile should be include in the query and give the =
chance to=20
the search engine to make a better choice in regard of my age, sex,=20
etc...
Interesting. Some of the =
issues with=20
product location are:
1. How to indicate location?
Address or map coordinates? How does one find =
map=20
coordinates? What happens when he moves?
2. How to associate location with =
products?
If a vendor has all inventory at a single location =
then the=20
location can be #FIXED in his DTD. If inventory is distributed =
around the=20
globe, each product or inventory group will have to be marked. The =
problem=20
is that now it makes no sense to indicate physical location. It =
will have=20
to be a store code which causes problem with search services since store =
codes=20
will have to be converted into location format used by the search=20
service.
As far as time constraints go, each =
product will=20
probably be marked with time. The problem is that some time =
constraints=20
are relative in nature.
*Ouch* I just thought of =
another painful=20
problem with prices. What happens when a store wants to put on a=20
sale? His database of products will have to map to different =
pricing=20
schemes constrained by time, location, or association.
All this hurts my head a bit but it =
is very=20
interesting indeed...
Regards,
------=_NextPart_000_008E_01BD3E0C.844A6680--
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)