> >There is clear agreement for providing support beyond Java,
> There is? I haven't heard that yet. I've heard that some people
> would like it (me, for example), but I haven't heard collectively
> that we've decided one way or the other.
Yes, just before Christmas we agreed on the list that SAX would not
contain anything that precludes non-Java OO implementations; in
particular, nothing in SAX will require dynamic type-checking. Since
then, we have also agreed that SAX will not rely on any Java-specific
classes such as java.net.URL or java.lang.Dictionary (though the Java
implementation itself will, of course use any classes that make
sense).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@microstar.com
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)