I suspect that SAX will strongly influence convention in this area. I do
not believe that SAX should undermine the intention of the XML spec. by
making this information unavailable. If XML's creators hadn't wanted
NDATA entities to be useful, they wouldn't have created them. I don't
think that this is the right time or place to rethink that decision.
To put it another way: SAX should simplify access to XML data. It should
not simplify XML by doing away with information necessary to take
advantage of basic XML features. When I am designing my XML information
system I don't want to have to change my documents to work around
arbitrary limitations in my parser. That's what XML was supposed to
prevent.
Paul Prescod
-- http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~paprescoArt is always at peril in universities, where there are so many people,=20 young and old, who love art less than argument, and dote upon a text=20 that provides the nutritious pemmican on which scholars love to chew.=20 -- Robertson Davies in "The Cunning Man"
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)