Re: element content vs. element attribute

Tad McClellan (tadmc@metronet.com)
Sun, 21 Dec 1997 08:35:56 -0600 (CST)


[ Admin note: If original posts are held to 70-72 chars per line, then
they won't word-wrap and be hard to read after being
quoted a few times.
]

> In other words, when should data be contained by elements? Or conversely, when
> should data be an attribute of an element instead of contained by that element?
> I prefer the latter method, given an attributes ability to store CDATA without
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^
> CDATA section delimiters. OSD and CDF use the former method for:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[ I hope I don't mispeak here. I haven't yet gotten my arms around all
the differences between XML and SGML. (That's why I am lurking here ;-)

Someone please correct me if I have it wrong in an XML context
]

"CDATA" is "overloaded" in SGML.

CDATA attributes and CDATA marked sections have some significant
semantic differences.

This was discussed in September in comp.text.sgml, in the thread with:

Subject: CDATA in attributes and content

Where this helpful URL was given (thanks to Joe English):

http://www.art.com/~joe/sgml/cdata.html

-- 
    Tad McClellan                          SGML Consulting
    tadmc@metronet.com                     Perl programming
    Fort Worth, Texas

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)