There are a large number of non-textual XML files under:
http://ala.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms/java/jumbo/cml12/cml/
most of them served from APPLETs, but you can get the *.xml from the HTML
source.
>
>As a co-editor of an (upcoming) RFC for text/xml and application/xml,
>I think that I should point out the correct procedure for encoding
determination. (I have not checked these two Web sites, and
>Flfred.)
>
>For those XML documents transmitted by the HTTP protocol, XML parsers
>should use the charset parameter of the media type text/xml (BTW,
>the default of this parameter is 8859-1). XML parsers should ignore
>the encoding declaration within XML documents transmitted by HTTP.
>More about this, see the XML PR and the HTTP/1.1
Thanks for this reminder. For Chemical Markup Language Henry and I had
originally devised our own MIME type (not official) : chemical/x-cml. But,
with the likely introduction of other namespaces (e.g. RDF:*, MathML) in
CML documents, it is clear that there is no need for diversity, since the
namespaces themselves will have means of identifying the XML application.
So CML documents will be "text/xml", unless we should use "application/xml"
instead.
<IGNORANCE>
What will differentiate a text/xml document from an application/xml one?
</IGNORANCE>
P.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg