Re: XML application
Eve L. Maler (elm@arbortext.com)
Mon, 15 Dec 1997 14:11:37 -0500
At 02:02 PM 12/15/97 -0500, Ingo Macherius wrote:
>
>> > <http://www.scripting.com/siteChanges.xml>
>
>> It is not valid XML, because of 3 things:
>More exact: It is neither well-formed nor valid XML ...
>
>> 1) the <?XML version="1.0"> PI is missing.
>
>Ouch. This is not well-formed at all.
>Use <?xml version="1.0"> as to the latest PR.
Note that the XML declaration PI isn't strictly required (though it's
recommended), so it's not a WF error for it to be missing. The other
comments you made were right on.
Eve