Both of these statements are, to an extent, correct. The browser wars
introduced or brought into the mainstream many interesting
innovations, but few (if any) of the good ones are a result of the
mess that both Netscape and Microsoft have both made of HTML.
Applets, real-time audio and video, virtual-reality, animations, and
other types of interaction have certainly made the web more exciting,
but why is it so difficult to find web pages that display well on my
640x480 notebook screen (and what's going to happen on even
lower-resolution TV screens)? How many web pages could
visually-impared people usefully have their software read aloud to
them? Why is it sometimes hard to write a web page that displays
properly in both Netscape and MSIE?
It is possible to innovate without messing around with the standards
(though, to be fair, there won't be an XML standard as such for a
couple more weeks).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@microstar.com
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)