Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas

Jonathan Robie (jwrobie@mindspring.com)
Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:35:21 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Joe Lapp: "Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Lapp: "Access Languages are Tied to Schemas"

At 02:28 PM 11/20/97 -0500, Joe Lapp wrote:
>Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>These properties are not easily represented:
>>
>>o Behavior (except for in languages that allow methods to be
>>represented as data, e.g. Java)
>>o Encapsulation constraints
>
>I'm not sure what you mean by "encapsulation constraints." OMT uses
>a variety of constraints, but none go by that name. Pouring over the
>UML documentation I only see the term "constraint" being used in a
>general way.

I'm thinking of public/protected/private access in languages like C++, i.e.
the constraints on access to encapsulated data.

Jonathan

Previous message: Joe Lapp: "Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Lapp: "Access Languages are Tied to Schemas"