Woops - this as an oversight. Turns out this XML is generated dynamically
via JavaScript and I forgot to update this script. This will be fixed
tonight.
> >As for blatant attempts at subversion, I'm just a country boy from
> >Australia, I don't get involved in that sort of thing :-) So, enough
> >politics. I'm more interested in constructive feedback from people you
have
> >actually played with the new parser....
>
> On Sunday, I ran a lot of my files that had demonstrated freaky parsing
> behavior in the past - files that parsed as valid when they were
explosively
> wrong (some referred to the wrong DTD, for instance), files that used
> parameter entities, and files that wouldn't parse at all. They all seem
to
> work properly now - so at least the bugs I had found are now dead. (I
only
> used jview - I'll run it through Sun's JDK and see what happens when I
have a
> chance.)
Music to my ears. Finally some good news :-)