Eve
At 05:56 PM 10/20/97 -0400, Ben Trafford wrote:
>Ingo Macherius wrote:
>>
>> In preparation of a talk I wondered if there already is a name for an
>> XML compatible HTML. HTML 4.0 surely is not syntactically compatible
>> to XML productions, but I would wonder if there isn't work underway.
>> Is it simply HTML 5.0, or HTML-XML ?
>> --
>
> As I've been developing an XML DTD to provide the functionality of HTML
>4.0 (now horrendously late - sigh) I've been using the working title of
>HTML-XML, just as you suggest above. I don't think it's the W3C's
>intention to replace HTML with XML, and I certainly would be surprised
>if they made the HTML 5.0 (or even 4.0) DTD from XML. Although, come to
>think of it, there probably wouldn't be a huge difference in the two
>DTDs, in terms of what they can do.
>
> I vote for HTML-XML. It's faster than saying "an XML DTD to provide the
>functionality of HTML 4.0."
>
>--->Ben Trafford
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
>
>
>