> Do not Architectural forms provide the traditional DTD syntax just that
> ability [to extend object types so that one class of object is a
> specialization of another more general class]?
[Michael Leventhal:]
> So say some but not really.
I'm one of those who say so. How "not really"?
-Steve
-- Steven R. Newcomb President voice +1 716 271 0796 TechnoTeacher, Inc. fax +1 716 271 0129 (courier: 23-2 Clover Park, Internet: srn@techno.com Rochester NY 14618) FTP: ftp.techno.com P.O. Box 23795 WWW: http://www.techno.com Rochester, NY 14692-3795 USA
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)