In my own (pretty weak) defense: I didn't notice that, for example,
the xml-dev list was in the address list; I merely scanned the list of
addresses it to verify that, in fact, it was a list with a lot of
insiders. I should have verified that the list contained no
*outsiders*, but I inexplicably failed to do that, blithely assuming
from the list's provenance, insider topic, insider tenor, and
recognizable insider addressees that it was a discussion taking place
within the family. I should have been more careful; this was
definitely a poor algorithm.
I must ask you folks who were not supposed to see the Layman material
to destroy it and forget it. Anyway, it's an internal discussion,
and, therefore, you can't know the context.
W3C people: I would not blame you for withdrawing my access to the
discussion. My blunder has caused some pain, and I regret that.
-Steve
--
Steven R. Newcomb President
voice +1 716 271 0796 TechnoTeacher, Inc.
fax +1 716 271 0129 (courier: 23-2 Clover Park,
Internet: srn@techno.com Rochester NY 14618)
FTP: ftp.techno.com P.O. Box 23795
WWW: http://www.techno.com Rochester, NY 14692-3795 USA
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)