#x3000 inconsistency in June XML Syntax spec?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Previous message: Andrew Layman: "RE: Sizes"

Eric Baatz - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS (ebaatz@barbaresco.East.Sun.COM)
Thu, 10 Jul 1997 15:03:29 -0400 (EDT)

One of the difference between the April and June specs was the
removal of #x3000 from

[1] S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xd |#xa)+

However, it still survives in

[14] PubidChar ::= #x20 | #x9 | #xd |#xa | #x3000 | [a-zA-Z0-9] ...

Should it be removed from [14] for consistency?