>By the way, you gain nothing by using "+" instead of "*", since
>#PCDATA can be an empty string. =20
I know, but why isn't it allowed at all? (or why was it allowed in SGML=
in
the first place?)
>For example, in full SGML, the
>following would satisfy (#PCDATA | stagedir)+ as well as it satisfies
>(#PCDATA | stagedir)*:
This means that I have to change all occurences of '+' to '*' in
mixed-content declarations in my SGML dtds in order to make them XML
compliant.
Perhaps it is better if I change my existing SGML dtds instead... :-)
Thank you,
<Gr0ve/>
------------------ Geir Ove Gr=F8nmo ------------------
Falch Infotek as, Stanseveien 21, 0902 Oslo, Norway
Phone: +47 22 90 27 36 Fax: +47 22 90 25 99
[grove@falch.no | http://www.falch.no/people/geirog]
-------------------------------------------------------