Re: Suggested List Protocol
Gavin Nicol (gtn@ebt.com)
Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:59:45 -0500
>Second that. The lack of this and a *standard* way to define
>the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and
>grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
>A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a
>development list.
Quite. I think we can model these objects in a number of ways
though. I would personally like to define the objects in IDL
*and* SGML... (for information on IDL etc. look at www.omg.org).